What is a "bridge petition"?
Return to main "H1B Issues" page
Many people are unclear on the concept of "bridge petitions" for H1B
purposes. In a December 27, 2005 USCIS policy memo titled "Interim guidance
for processing I-140 employment-based immigrant petitions and I-485 and H-1B
petitions affected by the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First
Century Act of 2000 (AC21) (Public Law 106-313)" the USCIS explained this
idea in an FAQ:
Question: Can there be successive H-1B portability
petitions filed for an alien while the previous H-1B petitions remain
pending (i.e. creating a “bridge” of H-1B petitions)?
Answer: Yes. However, to be approved every H-1B
portability petition must separately meet the requirements for H-1B
classification and for an extension of stay.
Question: If successive H-1B portability petitions can
be filed, what happens if an alien’s nonimmigrant status expires while
the H-1B portability petitions are pending and a petition in the
“bridge” is denied?
Answer: As stated above, to be approved every H-1B
portability petition must separately meet the requirements for H-1B
classification and for an extension of stay. In the event the alien’s
nonimmigrant status has expired while the petitions are pending, the
denial of any filing in the string of extension of stay and/or change of
status filings undercuts the “bridge” that “carried” any petition filed
after the expiration of any approved status which will result in the
denial of the successive requests to extend or change status.
So, what does this mean if the employee's I-94 expires while this process is
going on? The USCIS answered that question also:
Question: Can an H-1B temporary worker “port”
under §105 of AC21 (INA § 214(n)) from one employer to another even
after the alien’s I-94 or last approved petition has expired as long as
he or she is still in a “period of stay authorized by the Attorney
General”?
Answer: Yes. Under certain circumstances, an H-1B alien may
still be able to port to another H-1B employer even after the
alien’s I-94 or last approved petition has expired. In order to
port, however, such alien must meet all the requirements of INA §
214(n), including the requirement that the new petition be filed
while the alien is in a “period of stay authorized by the Attorney
General.” USUSCIS has previously determined and issued guidance
explaining what constitutes a “period of stay authorized by the
Attorney General.” One example would be:
- Alien is in H-1B status. Employer A timely files a non-frivolous
extension of the alien’s H-1B status. Alien’s original petition,
approved for Employer A, expires during the pendency of the
extension. Alien is then in a “period of stay as authorized by the
Attorney General” while Employer A’s extension is pending. Employer
B then files new petition and alien wants to port to Employer B.
Under INA § 214(n), the alien should be permitted to port because he
or she is in a “period of stay as authorized by the Attorney
General.” In other words, porting under INA §214 does not require
that the alien currently be in H-1B status as long as he or she is
in a “period of stay authorized by the Attorney General.”
Of course, if the I-94 expires, and the new petition is denied, then the
employee is not only in unlawful status, but also unlawful presence and must
leave the country.